BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Metformin superior to low‑fat diet for the treatment of patients with nonalcoholic
fatty liver disease and/or steatohepatitis
Bashkim Resuli, Vigjilenca Demiraj, Adriana Babameto, Klara Sema, Valdete Malaj
University Service of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mother Theresa Hospital, Tirana, Albania
Introduction Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
process: 1) the development of steatosis caused
(NAFLD) constitutes a worldwide health chal‑
by insulin resistance in the muscle, adipose tissue,
lenge. Cases of fatty liver diseases with inflam‑
and liver and 2) cytokine‑mediated inflammation,
mation that resemble alcoholic steatohepatitis
lipid peroxidation, and apoptosis.17‑19
but occur in nondrinkers were first described 30
Assessing liver injury in insulin resistant states
years ago.1,2 In the last decade, the disorder has
has become a major concern and no less of a chal‑
aroused a real interest. NAFLD is believed to ac‑
lenge given the current diagnostic tools. Liver bio‑
count for up to 90% of the cases of elevated liv‑
psy is regarded as the gold standard for the as‑
er function tests in patients without an identifi‑
sessment of fatty liver disease; however, its inva‑
able cause of liver disease.3 Recent studies have
siveness limits its use, especially in outpatients
made it clear that a subset of patients who devel‑
and research. On the other hand, sonography has
op nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), most‑
shown significantly high specificity and relative‑
ly those with alanine transaminase (ALT) levels
ly high sensitivity for the diagnostic occurrence
higher than twice the upper limit of normal, are
at increased risk of progression to liver disease
The search for the therapy of NASH is ongoing.
and may experience all complications of cirrho‑
Based on the concept of insulin resistance, a num‑
sis, such as end‑stage liver disease and hepatocel‑
ber of pilot studies have shown that reduction of
lular carcinoma.4‑8 Indeed, it can be argued that
body weight and improvement of insulin sensitiv‑
most cases of cryptogenic cirrhosis, which ranks
ity by metformin or thiazolidinediones provide
as the third leading indication for liver transplan‑
positive bio chemical and histo logical results.22‑29
tation after alcohol and hepatitis C, are due to
Metformin hydrochloride (N,N‑dimethylimidodi‑
carbonimidic diamide hydrochloride) is an anti‑
The rising prevalence of obesity, diabetes,
hyperglycemic drug of the biguanide class, which
and meta bolic syndrome evidently results in
decreases hepatic glucose production, decreases
an increasing prevalence of NAFLD. This trend
intestinal glucose absorption, and improves in‑
is of particular concern in the pediatric popu‑
sulin sensitivity by increasing peripheral glucose
lation, in which the reported increase in obesi‑
uptake and utilization. Despite that, it is known
ty will undoubtedly result in a higher evidence
that metformin therapy can lead to body weight
and prevalence of pediatric and adult NAFLD in
the future.10,11 In Albania, excess weight and obe‑
The objective of this study was to evalu‑
sity is becoming the major public health problem,
ate the efficacy of metformin compared with
primarily in middle‑aged women.12 NAFLD and
low‑fat diet (LFD) in patients with NAFLD and/
NASH are frequently observed in conjunction
with other components of the meta bolic syn‑
drome, such as arterial hypertension, diabetes,
Patients and methodsStudy population The study
obesity, and elevated lipids, which are considered
was a 24‑week prospective controlled trial com‑
Conflict of inter est: none declared.
the hepatic manifestations of the syndrome.13‑16
paring metformin plus LFD with LFD alone in 61
Why insulin resistance leads to fatty liver injury
outpatients with NAFLD and/or NASH, 46 men
is not completely clear. The most widely accept‑
(75%) and 15 women (25%), who presented at our
Copyright by Medycyna Praktyczna, Kraków 2012
ed patophysio logical model of NAFLD is a two‑hit
university department of gastroenterology and
POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNĘTRZNEJ 2012; 122 (Suppl 1)
hepatology during 2008–2009. All patients ful‑
was more than 3.6 and body mass index more
filled the following criteria: 1) insulin resistance
than 27.5 kg/m2. Pre‑ and post‑treatment body
(Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resi‑
mass, bio chemical data, and insulin resistance
stance – HOMA‑IR) value above 3.6; 2) elevation
were compared. The efficacy endpoints at 24 we‑
in the levels of ALT and aspartate transaminase
eks of the treatment were the normalization of
(AST); and 3) ultrasound evidence of fatty liver.
ALT and decreased insulin resistance.
The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) presen‑
ce of hepatitis B and C virus infection markers
Statistical analysis Continuous variables are pre‑
(HBsAg and anti‑HCV); 2) evidence of alcoho‑
sented as mean ± standard deviation. Group com‑
lic liver disease (less than 20 g ethanol per day);
parisons were conducted using the t test. Diffe‑
3) evidence of auto immune liver disease; 4) use
rences were considered significant at the P level
of insulin‑sensitizing and hepatotoxic drugs in
the previous 6 months; 5) presence of diabetes or a severe systemic disease; 6) evidence of meta‑
Results Baseline body weight, bio chemical data,
bolic liver disease (α‑1‑antitrypsin deficiency, Wil‑
and insulin resistance (HOMA‑IR) of the patients
son disease, or hemo chromatosis); 7) active sub‑
are presented in TABLE 1. Both groups were simi‑
lar in terms of age, sex, body weight, bio chemical
The study was approved by the National Eth‑
ics Committee. Informed consent was obtained
Significantly more patients treated with met‑
formin plus LFD (group A) achieved normal se‑rum ALT and AST levels and improvement of in‑
Procedures Patients were divided into 2 gro‑
sulin resistance compared with patients treated
ups. Group A included 35 patients (26 men and
with LFD alone (group B; P <0.05; TABLE 2).
9 women; mean age, 41.8 ±8.1 years) receiving
There was no significant difference in body
metformin 850 mg/daily plus low‑fat dietary
weight loss, fasting and postprandial blood glu‑
regime that aimed to reduce fat to 30% or lower
cose, total cholesterol, triglyceride and HDL
as generally recommended for 24 weeks. Group
cholesterol between the 2 groups (P >0.005)
B included 26 patients (20 men and 6 women;
(TABLE 2).
mean age, 42.6 ±7.3 years) receiving the same
No serious adverse events of metformin were
dietary counseling for the same period of time.
observed and treatment was not discontinued in
No vitamins or other nutritional supplements
were prescribed. Blood samples were obtained before and after the treatment (0 and 24 weeks)
Discussion There is currently no proven and
to determine serum levels of bilirubin, ALT and
approved treatment for patients with NAFLD
AST, fasting and postprandial blood glucose, fa‑
and/or NASH. Although body weight loss and
sting insulin, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and
life‑style modifications have been shown to be
high‑density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol.
effective,31,32 only a minority of patients are able
HOMA‑IR was calculated using the formula:
to adhere to sustained and intensive dietary inter‑
HOMA‑IR = fasting plasma insulin (microU/ml)
vention.33‑35 In the present study, we observed
× FPG (mg/dl)/405. We assumed IR when HOMA
that body mass loss (4–6 kg) at the end of treat‑ment with LFD alone was associated with nor‑malization of ALT in 21 of 26 patients (82%) and
TABLE 1 Baseline characteristics of body weight, bio chemical data and insulin
attenuation of insulin resistance only in 20% of
the patients (TABLE 2).
On the other hand, we found that a 24‑week
treatment with metformin at doses of 850 mg/dai‑
ly plus LFD was associated with a significantly higher rate of the normalization of ALT levels
and improvement of insulin resistance when com‑
pared with LFD alone. These data clearly indicate
the beneficial effect of metformin on insulin ac‑
tion. In fact, the role of hyperinsulinemia and in‑
creased insulin resistance as major pathogenic fac‑tors in the development of NAFLD and/or NASH,
and in this manner the therapeutic value of in‑
sulin‑sensitizing agents including thiazolidine‑
diones or biguanides, has been demonstrated in
several trials.28,36‑39 Moreover, it has been shown
that bio chemical response to treatment with metformin continued during a 6‑ to 12‑month
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
follow‑up period, suggesting the sustained ef‑fect of the drug.40
Abbreviations: ALT – alanine transaminase, AST – aspartate transaminase,
HDL – high-density lipoprotein, HOMA-IR – Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin
The meta bolic effect of metformin is thought to
Resistance, LFD – low-fat diet, MET – metformin
be mediated through the activation of adenosine
BRIEF COMMUNICATION Metformin superior to low‑fat diet for the treatment. TABLE 2 Body weight, bio chemical data, and insulin resistance at 24 weeks 7 Hashimoto E, Yatsuji S, Tobari M, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in pa‑
tients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Gastroenterol. 2009; 44 (Suppl
8 Tokushige K, Hashimoto E, Yatsuji S, et al. Prospective study of hepato‑
cellular carcinoma in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in comparison with hepa‑
tocellular carcinoma caused by chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol. 2010;
9 Kowdley KV, Caldwell S. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a twenty‑first
century epidemic. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006; 40 (Suppl 1): 2-4. 10 de Alvis NM, Day CP. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: The mist gradu‑
ally clears. J Hepatol. 2008; 48 (Suppl 1): 104-112. 11 World Health Organisation (WHO). The World Health Report 1998. Life
in the 21th century – a vision for all. Geneva: WHO 1998. 12 Shapo L, Pomerleau J, McKee M, et al. Body weight patterns in a coun‑
try of transition: a population-based survey in Tirana City, Albania. Public
13 Cheung P, Kapoor A, Puri P, et al. The impact of fat distribution on
the severity of nonalcoholic disease and meta bolic syndrome. Hepatology.
14 Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, Forlani G, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver, ste‑
Data are presented as number (percentage).
atohepatitis and the meta bolic syndrome. Hepatology. 2003; 37: 917-923. 15 Bugianesi E, McCullough AJ, Marchesini G. Insulin resistance: a meta-
Abbreviations: NS – nonsignificant, others – see TABLE 1
bolic pathway to chronic liver disease. Hepatolgy. 2005; 42: 987-1000. 16 Marchesini G, Marzochi R, Natale S. NAFLD - Why not to treat the in‑
sulin resistance? In: Non‑alcoholic steatohepatitis: from cell bio logy to clin‑
ical practice (Monothematic Conference of the European Association for
monophosphate (AMP)‑activated protein kinase
the Study of the Liver [EASL], Estoril, Portugal, September 2004). Lisbon,
in hepatic and peripheral tissue either directly or
17 Marchesini G, Brizi M, Bianchi M, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver dis‑
indirectly through another serine‑threonine ki‑
ease: a feature of meta bolic syndrome. Diabetes. 2001; 50: 1844-1850.
nase known as LKB1.41 It has also been demon‑
18 McCullough AJ. Pathophysiology of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Clin
strated that the activation of AMP kinase leads
Gastroenterol. 2006; 40 (Suppl 1): 17-29.
to transactivation of genes that inhibit gluconeo‑
19 Larter C, Farrell GC. Insulin resistance, adiponectin, cytokines in NASH:
which is the best target to treat? J Hepatol. 2006; 44: 253-261.
genesis and lipogenesis and promote fat acid and
20 Lee s, Park SH, Kim JH. Non invasive assessment of hepatic steato‑
glucose uptake in the liver and muscles.24
sis: Prospective comparison of the occurrence of imaging examinations.
It is also known that metformin therapy can
lead to weight loss.24,25,30 Body weight loss (4–6 kg)
21 Saadeh S, Yonussi ZM, Remer EM, et al. The utility of radio logical
imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2002; 123:
during 24‑week treatment in group A was in
fact a little higher compared with that in group
22 Suzuki A, Lindor K, St Saver J, et al. Effects of changes on body
B (TABLE 2). These results provide evidence that
weight and lifestyle in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2005; 43:
the beneficial effect of metformin therapy on
23 Riley P, Sudarshi D, Johal M, et al. Weight loss, dietary advice and
statin therapy in non‑alcoholic fatty liver disease: a retrospective study. Int
the improvement of insulin action and, at least
24 Loomba R, Lutchman G, Kleiner DE, et al. Clinical trial: pilot study
of metformin for the treatment of non‑alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment
Finally, we would like to underline the limita‑
tions of the study: lack of histo logical data and
25 Nair S, Diehl AM, Wiseman M, et al. Metformin in the treatment of
re‑evaluation of the positive results after the end
non‑alcoholic steatohepatitis: a pilot open label trial. Aliment Pharmacol
of treatment, as well as short period of treatment
26 Schwimmer JB, Middleton MS, Deutch R, Lavine JE. A phase 2 clini‑
(24 weeks). In fact, therapies for NAFLD and/or
cal trial of metformin as a treatment for non‑diabetic pediatric non‑alcoholic
NASH are likely to require long‑term treatment,
steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005; 21: 871-879. 27 Promrat K, Lutchman G, Uwaifo GI, et al. A pilot study of pioglitazone
treatment for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2004; 39: 188-196.
In conclusion, therapy directed at improving
28 Sanyal AJ, Mofrad PS, Contos MJ, et al. A pilot study of vitamin E ver‑
insulin resistance with metformin is beneficial
sus vitamin E and pioglitazone for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepa‑
in patients with NAFLD and/or NASH. Metform‑
titis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 2: 1107-1115.
in is more effective than LFD in treatment of pa‑
29 Belford R, Harrison RA, Brown K, et al. A placebo‑controlled trial of
pioglitazone in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med.
2006; 355: 2297-2307. 30 Bugianesi E, Gentilcore E, Manini R, et al. A randomized controlled tri‑ REFERENCES
al of metformin versus vitamin E or prescriptive diet in nonalcoholic fatty liv‑er disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100: 1082-1090. 1 Adler M, Schaffner F. Fatty liver hepatitis and cirrhosis in obese patients. 31 Huang MA, Greenson JK, Chao C, et al. One-year intense nutritional
counseling results in histo logical improvement in patients with nonalcoholic
2 Ludwig J, Viggiano TR, McGill BD, Oh BJ. Nonalcoholic steatohepati‑
steatohepatitis: a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005, 100: 1072-1081.
tis: Mayo clinic experience with an hitherto unnamed disease. Mayo Clin
32 Osland JE, Powel ER, Banks M, et al. Obesity management in liver clin‑
ics: translation of research into clinical practice. J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
3 Angulo P. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 33 Ballentani S, Delle Grave R, Suppini A, et al. Fatty Liver Italian Network. 4 Mulcahy N. Type 2 diabetes, high ALT levels boot risk of NASH. Int Med
Behaviour therapy for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the need for multidis‑
ciplinary approach. Hepatology. 2008; 47: 746-754. 5 Caldwell SH, Crespo AM, Kang HS, Al‑Osaimi AM. Obesity and hepato‑ 34 Chan HL, de Silva HJ, Leung NW et al. Asia-Pacific Working Party on
cellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2004; 127 (Suppl 1): 97-103.
NAFLD. How should we manage patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver dis‑
6 Bugianesi E, Leone N, Vanni E, et al. Expanding the natural history of
ease in 2007? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007; 22: 801-808.
nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: from cryptogenic cirrhosis to hepatocellular
35 de Piano A, Prado WL, Caranti DA, et al. Metabolic and nutritional
carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2002; 123: 134-140.
profile of obese adolescents with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007; 44: 446-452.
POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNĘTRZNEJ 2012; 122 (Suppl 1)
36 Caldwell Sh, Hespenheide EE, Redick JA, et al. A pilot study of a thiazo‑
lidinedione, troglitazone, in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Am J Gastroenterol.
2001; 96: 519-525. 37 Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Brunt EM, Wehmeier KR, et al. Interim re‑
sults of a pilot study demonstrating the early effects of the PPAR‑gamma li‑ gands rosiglitazone on insulin sensitivity, aminotransferases, hepatic steato‑ sis and body weight in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol. 2003; 38: 434-440. 38 Lin HZ, Yang SQ, Chuckaree C, et al. Metformin reverses fatty liver dis‑
ease in obese, leptin-deficient mice. Nat Med. 2000; 6: 998-1003. 39 Marchesini G, Brizi M, Bianchi G, et al. Metformin in non-alcoholic ste‑
atohepatitis. Lancet. 2001; 358: 893-894. 40 Uygun A, Kadryfici A, Isik AT, et al. Metformin in the treatment of pa‑
tients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004; 19: 537-544. 41 Watt MJ, Dzamko N, Thomas WG, et al. CNTF reverses obesity-
‑induced insulin resistance by activating skeletal muscle AMPK. Nat Med.
BRIEF COMMUNICATION Metformin superior to low‑fat diet for the treatment.
Macao Yearbook 2007 Part 1 Chapter 9 Effective Measures for Combating Crime; Public Order Remains Stable Faced with complex social changes, in 2006 Macao’s police forces took a series of measures to maintain public order in cooperation with Macao citizens. Police campaigns to prevent and combat petty crimes proved effective, with double-digit falls in robberies and pick-pocketing.
Key Facts on H1N1 Flu Virus H1N1 Flu Virus The H1N1 flu virus is a new strain of pandemic influenza which is different than the seasonal flu. People have no natural immunity to protect against this virus. The H1N1 flu virus emerged in April 2009 and surveillance of its spread shows that it is affecting more young and healthy people than the regular , which normally affects seniors and young chil