Legitimate internet pharmacy in Sydney where you can buy propecia australia online. Para compra cialis puede ser visto como un desafío. Aumenta Smomenta, y todos los que se poco a poco abrumado, como es lógico, cada vez más hombres están diagnosticados con disfunción eréctil.
Supporting guidance for successful completion of institutional research committee research proposal applications
Supporting Guidance for Successful Completion of
Institutional Research Committee Research Proposal Applications
School of Health Sciences Research Committee
The following document contains guidance on how to successfully construct a research
application for consideration by the BCIT Institute Research Committee. While this guidance
reflects best practices in areas of both scientific and scholarly inquiry, it should not be considered
to be an all-inclusive resource. Instead, applicants are invited to investigate the wide array of
resources dedicated to this topic found in both the library and on the web.
This section allows you to show what prior work has been done with respect to your research
question. In doing so, the reviewers can assess how your research will advance knowledge in
this particular area. You could survey the literature yourself or enlist the aid of a health sciences
librarian. Best practices suggest that this section begins with a general statement about why
research in this area is important. Research Question/Hypothesis
This section allows you to state the objectives of your research, including the explicit research
question that you are pursuing. How your question is phrased depends on the context of the
research. For example, if you are investigating whether a change to curriculum will improve
learner outcomes, an appropriately stated research question could be… “this research will test
whether applying learning activities in a simulation context improves learner outcomes relative
to delivering the same learning activities in a didactic context.”
If you are instead investigating the statistical significance of a scientific or quantitative
discovery, you may instead choose to state your research question in the form of a hypothesis;
for example, “our hypothesis is that marker x is more sensitive than marker y in measuring
patient response to metformin administration”.
The purpose of this section is to state the methodological approaches you’ll be using to carry out
your research. This needs to be provided in sufficient detail so that a reviewer can assess the
feasibility of you realizing your proposed research outcomes in the allowable time frame. Best
practices suggest that necessary elements will include:
• Description of study design including ‘test’ and control groups and sample size, if
• Description of any ethical considerations including consent, confidentiality, consideration
of participant safety. In cases where human subjects are used, the process to seek research ethics approval must be included.
• Description of experimental methods including any reagents, assays or instruments to be
• Description of how you will collect and analyze your data, including how you will
measure outcomes of your research. This may include statistics or you might instead use other types of quantitative or qualitative assessment tools. Examples of the latter group include summative course evaluations (i.e., examination grades) or measures of end-user satisfaction, such as surveys.
Significance of/Implications for Research
Use this section to describe how your research will advance knowledge and/or practice in this
area. This might include showing what follow-on research could be taken up, given the potential
findings of your study. References
Although the size constraints of a research proposal do not allow for the comprehensive use of
references, a good research proposal will contain a sufficient number allowing the reviewer to
assess the currency/quality of your literature review and the research methods proposed.
Note To Attending Physician/Prescriber Personal Consult Physician: Physician, Unassigned This review is based on the information provided. Background Patient with dementia and behaviors and now non-responsive, will not talk, does not interact per family. Recent psych admission d/t behaviors likely related to her dementia. On Exelon Patch, Ativan prn, Seroquel prn, Trazadone, Namenda
Speeches and Short Articles THE “RIVER BLINDNESS” CONTROL PROGRAMMES OCP AND APOC IN AFRICA: A CRITICAL REVIEW André Rougemont* ABSTRACT Onchocerciasis Control Programme in West Africa (OCP; 1974 – 2002) was one of the most successful large scale operations ever carried out in the field of vector transmitted diseases. It is also an example to demonstrate that a