GPRA ONLINE EXAM RESOURCES CLINICAL CASES GPRA ONLINE EXAM RESOURCES Short Case – 8 minutes Alan Chew
GPRA wishes to acknowledge Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd for their support for this resource in the form of an unrestricted educational grant. This case has been prepared by In Vivo Communications Pty Ltd on behalf of Pfizer Australia.
Disclaimer & Copyright
rights related to GPRA's Online Exams Resources (OER) are reserved. All materials contained in this website are protected by Australian
copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or all broadcast without the prior written
permission of General Practice Registrars Australia Ltd. (GPRA) or in the case of third party materials, the owner of that content. You may
not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the clinical cases provided. Al efforts have been made to
ensure that material presented in this publication is correct at the time of publishing. Due to the rapidly changing nature of the industry,
GPRA does not make any warranty or guarantee concerning the continued accuracy or reliability of the content.
SECTION A: This information is given to the candidate INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES STANDARD INSTRUCTIONS: ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS
• Take an appropriate history from the patient.
• When you are ready, request the details of an appropriate physical examination from the observing examiner.
• Suggest appropriate investigations, and request results of these investigations from the observing examiner.
• Outline your conclusions and proposed immediate and long-term management plan to the patient.
• Discuss the essential issues that arise with the patient and suggest appropriate management.
• Outline your conclusions and proposed management plan to the patient. SECTION A: This information is given to the candidate
Alan is a retired 69-year-old man with a 5-year history of type 2 diabetes. Alan is a
patient of a colleague – a GP in your group practice who is currently on leave. At the
time of initial diagnosis he was advised to lose at least 5 kg, however he has not
succeeded in doing this. Alan has been prescribed atorvastatin, 20 mg OD for
hypercholesterolaemia. He also takes irbesartin 150mg OD for his hypertension, which
is currently controlled at 128/80 mmHg. And aspirin 100 mg OD. He commenced
metformin therapy 12 months ago. He was initially prescribed 500 mg bd, but as his
HbA1C remained at 8, this was recently increased to1000 mg bd, which resulted in a
decrease of HbA1C to 7.9%. He has suffered from intermittent diarrhoea, a common
side-effect of metformin. He was then prescribed glimepiride at a dose of 1 mg every
morning Given that Alan’s HbA1c is still above the target level, his glimepiride dose has
been raised to 2 mg. He is also taking 100mg aspirin OD. Alan’s neighbour has
brought him to your clinic today. Alan is complaining of dizziness, nausea and
A copy of the patient record summary sheet is attached.
FULL SUMMARY Patient Details Social History
Retired carpenter, Separated from his wife 10 years ago, living alone, no children.
Family History Current Medications
atorvastatin 20 mg OD, irbesartin 150mg OD, metformin
1000 mg, aspirin 100 mg OD, BD, glimepiride 2 mg OD
Immunisations Past Medical History
Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 5 years ago. Hypertension,
hypercholesterolaemia. Hernia operation 15 years ago.
SECTION B: This information is given to the patient role player/examiner
You are a retired 69-year-old man, living alone since your separation from your wife 10
years ago. You have no children, and your closest relatives live interstate. You were
diagnosed with type 2 diabetes five years ago. You are a non-smoker, and will have an
occasional beer with friends, but no other alcohol. You take atorvastatin daily for
hypercholesterolaemia. You also take irbesartan for your hypertension, and aspirin. At
the time of initial diagnosis you were advised to lose at least 5 kg, but you have not
succeeded in this. You commenced metformin therapy 12 months ago. You were
initially prescribed 500 mg bd. This was recently increased to1000 mg bd. Your HbA1c
was initially 8% but since the increase in metformin dose it has come down to 7.9%.
You have suffered from intermittent diarrhoea that appears to be related to taking
metformin. You have been taking glimepiride 1 mg every morning, and have just
started taking a higher dose. You asked a neighbour to bring you to the doctor today
because you are feeling dizzy, with nausea and headache, and you just managed to
stop yourself falling down your front steps. You have been told about various possible
side effects of all your medications, and what to do if adverse events occur, but you did
not pay much attention at the time, and can’t remember much about the instructions.
Additional HISTORY Information only to be given with appropriate enquiry from the candidate:
The symptoms started about 3 hours after starting the higher dose of glimepiride, which
you took with breakfast this morning. (black tea with sugar and toast with butter and
vegemite). You have not eaten since. You have had no bumps or blows to the head, or
any recent falls. You are conscientious about taking your medication, except you
stopped taking the statin when your prescription ran out, and did not get it renewed
because you thought you were taking too many tablets. You take very little exercise
apart from occasional work in the garden. You do not like cooking, and tend to buy
convenience food such as frozen pies and chips. You are not particularly concerned
Suggested cues/prompts if candidate requires assistance:
The possibility of hypoglycaemia in an elderly patient taking a sulphonylurea should be
A copy of the patient record summary sheet is attached.
FULL SUMMARY Patient Details Social History
Retired carpenter, separated from his wife 10 years ago, living alone, no children.
Family History Current Medications
atorvastatin 20 mg OD, irbesartin 150mg OD, aspirin 100 mg
OD, metformin 1000 mg BD, glimepiride 2 mg OD
Immunisations Past Medical History
Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 5 years ago. Hypertension,
hypercholesterolaemia. Hernia operation 15 years ago.
SECTION B: This information is given to the patient role player/examiner PHYSICAL EXAMINATION 1/These clinical findings are available on a separate sheet that is to be handed to candidates when they ask for any physical examination findings. 2/All other physical findings are normal. General Appearance/behaviour Restless and agitated, sweating profusely Height 1.75 m BMI 32 BP 128/80 mm Hg INVESTIGATIONS Candidate is to request specific tests Surgery Tests
Finger-prick test: blood glucose: 3.1 mmol/L
Other investigations Lipid profile Other test results within the normal range SECTION C: This information is given to the examiner/facilitator Listed below are the key issues to be covered in this case. (The facilitator/examiner can “tick” these as covered during the consult) Specific action candidates should take
o Candidates should consider the possibility of hypoglycaemia in an elderly patient
taking glimepiride, and take a fingerprick glucose test in the surgery.
Diagnosis Appropriate management and explanation:
o As the patient appears to have symptomatic hypoglycaemia, a sweet substance
should be given immediately (e.g. 4 teaspoons of sugar in a glass of water, or 2
teaspoons of sugar in a glass of cordial, lemonade or orange juice, or 4 to 5
jellybeans. (RWH Clinical Practice Guidelines) If possible this should be followed
by complex carbohydrate, e.g. a piece of fruit or a sandwich. (RWH Clinical
o Blood glucose should be rechecked in 15-30 minutes (RWH Clinical Practice
o As the sulfonylurea is the likely cause of hypoglycaemia, alternative
hypoglycaemic therapy should be initiated, taking into account:
o the patient’s lipid profile and cardiovascular risk factors
o desirability of establishing glycaemic control,
o avoiding the risk of repeat hypoglycaemia. This is particularly desirable as
A thiazolidinedione could be considered, as these do not pose the risk of
hypoglycaemia. They also exert a beneficial effect on the lipid profile, with pioglitazone
having a more beneficial effect than rosiglitazone (Cohen and Colman 2006, Goldberg
et al 2005) Alan meets the approved indication for authority prescription of pioglitazone
as his blood glucose concentrations are inadequately controlled by metformin treatment
and he is not able to tolerate the sulfonylurea. Pioglitazone can be used as dual therapy
with metformin. Studies have shown that as adjunctive therapy to metformin,
pioglitazone improves glycaemic control (Charbonnel et al 2005). Pioglitazone could be
initiated at 15 mg daily, with the option of titrating up to a maximum dose of 45 mg daily.
The patient could also be told that metformin alone may be sufficient for glycaemic
control if he loses weight and adheres to a suitable diet and exercise regime. This may
be an additional incentive for him to lose weight.
The sulfonylurea should be withdrawn by titrating the dose down by 1 mg every two
Alan should be re-educated about the symptoms of hypoglycaemia and what to do if
they occur. He should also be informed of the benefits of taking his medication (and
also the possible adverse events associated with his medication). Alan’s diet and
exercise should also be discussed and suggestions made to improve his diet.
Arrange appropriate follow up.
o Alan should be monitored closely when the new hypoglycaemic therapy
o As Alan lives alone, a social worker or similar health professional should
assess his support network and perhaps consider installing an alarm
system in the patient’s home that he can use to alert friends or neighbours
in case he suffers a severe hypoglycaemic episode.
o A health professional could be enlisted to help Alan improve his diet, with
• Alan has stopped taking his statin. I is important to stress the need to control blood lipids and a statin should be restarted. Given the slightly low HDL it might be appropriate to prescribe Rosuvastatin as this has been shown to increase HDL levels. The triglyceride level is slightly high and should be addressed in the first instance with dietary advice
• Encouraging an increase in exercise might help to increase HDL • Changing to a sustained release form of metformin may help to reduce the GI side effects
This checklist below is a guide to Key Features used by Examiners to assist in clinical
case ratings. The lists are not intended to be prescriptive or exhaustive and do not form
On completion of the case, the candidate/examiner/group may wish to score themselves as part of a feedback process.
Place a cross (X) along each line according to the candidate’s performance on that
CLINICAL CASE RATINGS KEY FEATURES CHECKLIST Key Features Clinical Case Rating Descriptions Rate the candidate on their ability to establish rapport and to communicate effectively with the patient in a pleasant, clear and logical manner using appropriate communication skills and language. 3. History taking Rate the candidate on their ability to take a relevant and organised history; following appropriate cues and eliciting both positive and negative details important to the assessment and management of the patient. 8. Investigations
Rate the candidate on their ability to select relevant, cost-effective investigations in an
appropriate sequence, displaying consideration for the safety and comfort of the patient.
9. Diagnosis
Rate the candidate’s ability to make an accurate diagnosis based on interpretation of
the history, physical examination and investigations.
13. Management
Rate the candidate on their ability to manage the issues raised in this case, both now
and in the future. Candidates should offer effective explanations, education and
choices to patients, and involve the patient, family and relevant community resources in
their immediate and on going management plans. Candidates should demonstrate
responsibility for the immediate and ongoing management of the patient.
18. Prompting To what extent was prompting/probing necessary to assist the candidate? The 6 categories are: Almost continuously (cross on far left), very frequently, frequently, occasionally, minimally, not at all (cross on far right).
Diabetes Australia Guidelines Development (DAGD) Consortium. National evidence
based guidelines for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Prevention and
detection of macrovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. NH&MRC; 2004NHMRC
guidelines http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/di7todi13syn.htm
Diabetes Australia Guidelines Development (DAGD) Consortium. National evidence
based guidelines for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Blood pressure
control in type 2 diabetes. NH&MRC; 2004. NHMRC guidelines
http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/di7todi13syn.htm
Diabetes Australia Guidelines Development (DAGD) Consortium. National evidence
based guidelines for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Detection and
prevention of foot problems in type 2 diabetes NH&MRC; 2005. NHMRC guidelines
http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/di7todi13syn.htm
Diabetes Australia/RACGP. Diabetes management in general practice. 12th edition
Available at http://www.racgp.org.au/scriptcontent/diabetes/index.cfm Accessed 15
National Heart Foundation of Australia/Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand.
Position statement on lipid management 2005. Available free online at:
http://www.heartfoundation.com.au/downloads/Lipids_HLCPosStatementFINAL_2005.p
RWH Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypoglycaemia: management
http://www.rwh.org.au/rwhcpg/womenshealth.cfm?doc_id=8728 Accessed 15 Mar 2007
Therapeutic Guidelines Endocrinology. Revised September 2004. Therapeutic
1. Charbonnel B, Schernthaner G, Brunetti P et al. Long-term efficacy and tolerability of add-on
pioglitazone therapy to failing monotherapy compared with addition of gliclazide or metformin in patients
with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2005; 48: 1093–104.
2. Cohen J, Colman P. Type 2 diabetes--the pharmacotherapy of glycaemic control and risk factor
modification. Aust Fam Physician. 2006;35:380-4.
3. Goldberg RB, Kendall DM, Deeg MA et al. A comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone
and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1547–54.
Pain, distress ? Morphine IV 5 mg (2 mg in elderly, COPD) Oxygen sat < 95% despite O ? Increase FiO2 CPAP 5-7.5 cm H O, BiPAP if resp. acidosis Mechanical ventilation if refractory resp. insuff. Treat underlying arrhythmias, etiologies- Determine clinical picture See guidelines STEMI-NSTEMI AHF + ACS ? Consider IABP, transfer to PCI centre
Opening [Standard presentation] A look back at our past Jean-Louis Vincent (Brussels , Belgium) Report of the Round Table conference on “Evidence in the ICU” John J Marini (St Paul , United States) - Djillali Annane (Garches , France) EGDT ProCESS? Derek C Angus (Pittsburgh , United States) Immunotherapy of Sepsis - the New Frontier Richard Hotchkiss (St Louis , United State